Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Juror dismissed in second-degree murder trial of Mark Stobbe
WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Enlarge Image
Mark Stobbe (left) is on trial for allegedly killing his wife Beverly Rowbotham in 2000.
Another juror has been dismissed in the second-degree murder trial of Mark Stobbe.
The juror was discharged by Court of Queen's Bench judge Chris Martin.
It's the second juror to leave this trial this week. Twelve jurors remain.
Because the trial was expected to last two months, 15 jurors were selected.
The first juror was discharged before the trial because she was pregnant, the second juror left earlier this week, and the third juror was dismissed because he kept falling asleep during testimony.
Martin told jurors today the man suffers from sleep apnea. "Everyone needs to pay attention," Martin said. "We need to do the job properly. We need to be seen to be doing the job properly."
The trial continues this morning with testimony from Mary Ellen Dewar, Beverly Rowbotham's best friend.
Stobbe, 54, has pleaded not guilty to killing Rowbotham, his wife of seven years, with an ax or hatchet during an argument in October 2000 at the couple's St. Andrews home.
More Local
- Back to Top
- Return to Local
Most Popular Local
- A SHED is not enough
- Scientists lash Harper government for pulling plug on Experimental Lakes Area
- Two teens arrested after downtown restaurant break-in
- Beer vendor robbery puts victim in hospital
- Family seeks answers in West End killings
- Frost warning issued
- Hundreds gathered to watch eclipse
- Severe storm warning issued
- Sex-scandal inquiry to be heard in city
- Arson strike force investigates Osborne Village fire
- Boozy night out, lying cost city man big bucks
- Rapid buses rattling homes
- Severe storm warning issued
- Triple whammy hits homes
- Judge faces second complaint
- Sex-scandal inquiry to be heard in city
- Homicide victim identified
- Common courtesy decreasingly common
- Scientists lash Harper government for pulling plug on Experimental Lakes Area
- Homicide leaves family reeling
- Boozy night out, lying cost city man big bucks
- Neighbours shaken by two deaths
- Teen hit by vehicle on Pembina
- Rapid buses rattling homes
- Has Gimli gone to pot?
- Severe storm warning issued
- Boy, 3, wanders away from daycare
- Dr. Seuss banned from B.C. classroom
- Triple whammy hits homes
- RCMP seize counterfeit toys from city stores
- Scientists lash Harper government for pulling plug on Experimental Lakes Area
- Enter their world of intrigue
- Sun shines on long weekend Sunday
- How do I love thee? Let me count the ways
- Bread, milk... and some wine
- Second World War plane wings into town soon
- Changes favour pedal-pushers
- Weeding out the chemicals
- A SHED is not enough
- Frost warning issued
- Judge faces second complaint
- Scientists lash Harper government for pulling plug on Experimental Lakes Area
- Feds sink key science program
- Weeding out the chemicals
- Cottage buyers in driver's seat in Lac du Bonnet area
- Manitoba to have standard province-wide school report cards
- Province starts to enforce law on criminal liability in job accidents
- Common courtesy decreasingly common
- Boozy night out, lying cost city man big bucks
- New rules protect renters
- Dating game begins early at Narcisse
- Has Gimli gone to pot?
- RRC's old gem a beauty
- Attack on hockey ref nets jail time
- Osborne Village voted Canada's best neighbourhood
- Our Village is as good as it gets
- Judge faces second complaint
- Scientists lash Harper government for pulling plug on Experimental Lakes Area
- The wonder of creepy, crawly Manitoba spiders
- Feds sink key science program
“We need to carefully add all the diverse elements that people need to live in a place: restaurants, workplaces, nice residences, perception of safety, green space, convenient transport, nearby schools for the kids they would like to have - if any piece is missing, the outcome will not last long.”
Posted by: goldenbob
Article: A SHED is not enough
Ads by Google









Comments are not accepted on this story because they might prejudice a case before the courts.